Sarbanes-Oxley Hits Small Business, Too
Suppliers to publicly held companies that fall under the Sarbanes-Oxley accounting rules have to show they have adequate controls.
When John Bostick, chief executive of dbaDirect in Florence, Ky., first learned one of his customers was sending auditors from PriceWaterhouseCoopers to investigate his company’s processes and controls last year, it rubbed him the wrong way. It was, he says, like an unexpected visitor, arriving with a white glove to see how clean your house is. “It’s uncomfortable,” he says.
But more such calls came from Fortune 1000 clients and Bostick soon realized that this is the new reality for many small businesses: As publicly-traded companies scramble to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the 2002 law aimed at preventing corporate accounting meltdowns ŕ la Worldcom, service organizations that contract with them are getting caught up in the rules, too. Specifically, big corporate customers who buy dbaDirect’s information-technology services have to file annual Section 404 reports, in which they attest that their companies — and certain suppliers—have effective internal controls and processes to ensure the integrity of financial reporting.
While auditors for public and private corporations have been requesting SAS 70s from service organizations since the 1990s, “Interest has definitely increased because of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404,” says Chuck Landes, vice president of the professional standards group at the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Washington, D.C. It’s not just companies like dbaDirect, which has hooks into client databases, that are affected. A whole range of small companies, from payroll processors to real estate services companies that handle rent transactions, are called on to prove they are up to snuff—often at their own expense. Indeed, dbaDirect is among a growing number of small businesses trying to gain control of the process by paying for their own SAS 70 Type II audits (more formally known as a Statement on Auditing Standards No. 70), which provide its large clients with an independent auditor’s opinion on the effectiveness of dbaDirect’s processes and controls.
The investment of time and money is considerable—anywhere from $40,000 to $1 million, says Jim Pajakowski, a managing director of Protiviti, a unit of Menlo Park, Calif-based Robert Half International that specializes in internal audits and compliance. But paying for a SAS 70 audit has several benefits, he says. “Instead of having every single client come in and look at their controls, they have an independent party come in and do a report,” he says. And, for certain industries, he adds, SAS 70 “is almost always part of contract negotiations.” In businesses such as IT outsourcing, not having a SAS 70 can keep suppliers from getting new contracts.
| Under the SAS 70 Microscope | ||
|
What is it? |
Bostick quickly realized his business required the audit. “We proactively said we’re going to do whatever it takes to work with the Fortune 1000 companies,” he says. The company already had documented its processes. So it began organizing and centralizing them, then looked for holes. Then the auditors came in to inspect the processes and controls.
The exercise was no cakewalk. “It’s not very fun. It’s very tedious. It’s distracting to a business you’re already busy with,” Bostick says. “But you’ve got to do what you’ve got to do. It’s become a mandatory part to get in the game.”
The audit cost dbaDirect about $20,000 and took about 12 weeks to complete from preparation to final report. Bostick says he got a good deal on the auditor’s fee, due to his firm’s initial prep work and the scope of the project. He also shopped around and got multiple bids for the work.
Beyond retaining clients, the SAS 70 process can help a company land new business and discover ways to be more efficient. “It’s absolutely made us better,” Bostick says. “These processes protect you, shore you up and help you achieve sustainability in business” by pointing out holes in your systems.
For Chicago-based Fieldglass, a provider of Web-based platforms for managing contingent labor services, completing the SAS 70 audit streamlined the sales cycle. Previously, with each new prospect, “I’d have to show them what we do, and do the dog-and-pony show for them,” says Dan Bell, vice president of client assurance. “Although I made a compelling presentation, there really wasn’t any proof. Now with the SAS 70 in hand, I feel I don’t have to do that any more.”
Fieldglass spent six to eight months preparing for its SAS 70 audit by documenting every process, then looked for holes and redundancies. “It really helps make a more bulletproof process,” Bell says.
An unexpected benefit, Bell says, was opening communication among the firm’s 70 employees as they prepared for the audit. “People tend to work in silos. They know everything about their job but nothing about their colleagues’ jobs,” he says. “Now we know a tremendous amount more about what everyone does than before.”
Still, some small businesses find that they can furnish proof of adequate controls without the expense of an audit. For example, CVM Solutions, a supplier of vendor management systems, weighed the cost of a SAS 70 audit and decided it would be cheaper to answer client inquiries as they arise, says Rajesh Voddiraju, president and chief executive. So far, the strategy is working for the Oak Brook Terrace, Ill.-based company, which counts 120 of the Fortune 500 among its clients. “We haven’t lost any business because we don’t have a SAS 70,” Voddiraju says.
But, he notes, most requests for bids ask for the SAS 70 and “if you don’t have it, you have to go through a more thorough interrogation.” In fact, clients typically spend two to six months querying CVM about its controls and testing its security. Though the client is performing the audit, Voddiraju estimates the process commands between 20 and 200 hours of labor for CVM per client. (OK? Yes) “It’s a significant upfront investment for us to go through such a process,” he says. In addition, he concedes that the process can be a big distraction for the boss. “If the CEO is involved in the due diligence, it’s time they’re not doing anything else,” he says.
How long will CVM hold out? “I don’t know what the tipping point would be,” Voddiraju says. Probably when CVM concludes—as other small businesses have—that, like Sarbanes-Oxley is for big corporations, SAS 70 is becoming part of the cost of doing business.

